Update 'Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do'

Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+<br>MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have up until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be permitted to take leave and be paid till completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an [employment](https://jobedges.com) attorney who represents federal workers as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM's deferred resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really don't consider it a lot a deal. I believe it's a demand  [elearnportal.science](https://elearnportal.science/wiki/User:LuzLoy740030404) to resign with an unclear guarantee that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for as much as eight months - but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been using the term buyout to describe what this is since there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for approximately eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that's a really misleading term to utilize in this situation. When you consider a buyout, there's usually some sort of composed arrangement or a concrete deal to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your advice, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout extreme care. There are no assurances consisted of in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for specific is that if you alter your mind,  [wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de](https://wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de/wiki/User:KathrynS59) the agency's probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically providing up control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some category of staff member who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most careful since leaving earlier than meant can have severe repercussions, possibly, on their [benefits](https://calciojob.com).MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a bargain for  [accc.rcec.sinica.edu.tw](https://accc.rcec.sinica.edu.tw/mediawiki/index.php?title=User:DanialCulp7395) individuals who do not wish to return to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal workers that they have to return in - to work. And if they do not, then they have the alternative to resign,  [wiki.team-glisto.com](https://wiki.team-glisto.com/index.php?title=Benutzer:ChristenaVigano) and this administration is extremely kindly offering to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just - in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it's designed to get folks who work truly difficult to resign. I think it's attempting to pull the wool over a lot of people's eyes because there are no warranties. And these are people who like their job. They love the mission of the firm. They work hard. And right now, they're facing very tough choices, especially if they're remote. I suggest, it's really coercive.MARTIN:  [clashofcryptos.trade](https://clashofcryptos.trade/wiki/User:ErnieFzc7266940) You say it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially,  [historydb.date](https://historydb.date/wiki/User:Tasha25K94) if you're someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN:  [timeoftheworld.date](https://timeoftheworld.date/wiki/User:LorraineMco) Do you expect legal challenges simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so extraordinary that I think a great deal of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I'm unsure if the offer itself may be challengeable. I believe the larger question is the execution of these terms. I'm not mindful of any authority that exists today for OPM to purchase firms to give this number of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is quite possibly setting the phase for obstacles because I feel OPM has significantly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an [employment](https://www.cvgods.com) attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.<br>
+<br>Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and consents pages at www.npr.org for additional information.<br>
+<br>NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR specialist. This text may not be in its last type and might be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability might vary. The  of NPR's programming is the audio record.<br>